Framekit templates
Start from a designer-made template
Use template
Use template
Use template
Use template
Use template
Use template
Use template
Use template
Framekit vs Pitch comes down to a question most deck comparisons skip: after you send the deck, do you need to know who opened it, which slide they lingered on and when they forwarded it?
Pitch is built around that answer being yes. Framekit is built around it not mattering.
Pitch is a collaborative presentation platform with sales-grade telemetry, and it is good at both halves.
Its advanced links, visit notifications, email capture and passcode-protected links exist because a team selling with decks needs to know which prospect read to slide nine.
If your decks are treatments, lookbooks and credentials rather than pipeline, you pay per seat for telemetry you may never open.
A collaborative deck platform is software where a team drafts, brands and shares presentations together, with analytics on what recipients do after the link goes out.
Framekit is an AI website builder whose Slides tool makes treatments, lookbooks and portfolio decks on the same account as a portfolio site, client galleries, video review and a store.
On 12 October 2026 we re-verified every Pitch plan, seat limit, AI credit allowance and sharing feature on Pitch's own pricing page, and corrected this page's earlier per-seat team figure and its claims about Framekit's AI.
We also confirmed in the product that Framekit's team members are website admins who cannot open a deck, and rebuilt the team pricing below on that basis.
Framekit is the better choice for creative documents built by one person, whether a solo creative or the one producer in a studio who owns the decks, because decks are unlimited, hand edits never touch the AI allowance and the same account carries a portfolio site, client galleries and review links.
Pitch is the better choice for a team where several people build decks, since a Framekit deck belongs to the account that made it and its team members are website admins, and for anyone who needs to track who opened a deck, passcode-protect links, co-edit in real time or hand over editable PowerPoint, none of which Framekit offers.
Three deck builders cost EUR 540 a year on Pitch Team in one workspace, against $252 for three separate Framekit Starter accounts that share nothing.
Full disclosure: Framekit is our own product, and Pitch does several things we cannot do at all, which is why they come first below. Pitch facts are read from its own pricing page on 12 October 2026, where prices were shown in euros; Framekit facts come from the shipped product. Nothing here is a timed or scored hands-on test of either tool.
How This Comparison Was Put Together
This comparison rests on what Pitch and Framekit each publish about their plans, seat limits, AI allowances and sharing controls, plus arithmetic on those figures, because the decision between them is mostly about who builds the decks, what each seat costs and what you can learn after sending.
Read at the source. Pitch's plan cards, its full feature comparison and its FAQ on Pitch's pricing page, read on 12 October 2026.
Pitch showed prices in euros to our read, as it did in September; if your page shows another currency, the structure below still holds. Framekit's facts come from the product as it ships and its published pricing in US dollars.
Calculated. The year-one costs are Pitch's per-seat yearly rates multiplied out for one, three and five people, set against Framekit's yearly prices counted as one account per person who builds decks, because Framekit decks cannot be shared between accounts.
Currency conversion is left to you rather than guessed.
Not covered. Pitch's CRM and analytics integrations are described from its plan list only. No load times or performance scores appear for either tool.
Framekit vs Pitch by the Numbers
These are the figures that settle most Framekit vs Pitch decisions, each read from the vendor's own page in October 2026 or calculated from it, and each one returns in a table further down where the reasoning is laid out in full.
- EUR 10, 15 and 20. Pitch Plus, Team and Business per seat per month, billed yearly, a 17 percent saving on the monthly rates of EUR 12, 18 and 24.
- 1, 25 and 200. The member limits on Pitch Plus, Team and Business. Plus is a one-person plan.
- 25 advanced links. What Pitch Team includes to track visits, slide views and time spent per slide. Business makes them unlimited.
- 100 AI credits. Pitch Free's allowance, once; paid plans give 500 or 750 credits per seat per month, shared across the team.
- $84 a year. Framekit Starter billed yearly for one deck builder, with the full template library, uploaded fonts and no badge.
- $180 a year. Framekit Pro billed yearly, adding PowerPoint export; Pro's three team members administer the website and cannot open a deck.
- 1 total. What a Framekit deck tells you about readers: a total view count per deck, nothing per person.
Framekit vs Pitch at a Glance
Read this table with its weighting in mind, because the analytics and link-control rows decide it for a team that sells with decks, while the billing and template rows decide it for a creative studio, and there is very little middle ground between those two buyers.
| Framekit | Pitch | |
|---|---|---|
| Who pays | The account; each deck belongs to the one account that made it | Every seat; Plus is one person only |
| One builder, colleagues only read | $84 on Starter; readers need no account | EUR 120 on Plus; readers open a sharing link |
| Three people who each build decks, a year | $252 on three Starter accounts, nothing shared between them | EUR 540 on Team, one workspace |
| Decks | Unlimited, every plan | Unlimited, every plan |
| AI | Monthly allowance on every plan, one pool across decks | 100 credits once on Free; 500 or 750 per seat a month, shared across the team |
| Tracking who opened a deck | No, total view count only | Advanced links on Team and Business |
| Passcode on a link | No | Team and Business |
| Real-time collaboration and roles | No co-editing, no comments, no deck sharing between accounts | Guests on every plan; commenter role and co-presenting from Team |
| PowerPoint | Export as pictures on Pro, up to 60 slides | Imports PPTX; exports PPTX on paid plans |
| Custom domain for deck links | No | Team and Business |
| Templates for treatments, lookbooks, shot lists | Yes | 150+ templates, aimed at business decks |
| Site, galleries, review, store | Same account | No |
In one linePitch tells you what happened after you sent the deck and lets a team build it together, while Framekit puts one person's decks on the same account as everything else that person sends a client.
Where Pitch Wins
Pitch beats Framekit in five areas, and each one is absolute rather than a matter of degree, because Framekit does not offer any of them at any price, so for a team that sells with decks any single one is enough to settle the comparison.
Engagement tracking. According to Pitch's plan comparison, Team includes 25 advanced links that track visits, slide views and time spent on each slide, plus visit notifications, email capture before viewing and member and guest analytics; Business makes advanced links unlimited.
Framekit shows a total view count per deck and nothing else. If you follow up based on engagement, a view counter is not a substitute.
Link controls. Passcode-protected links, a custom domain for shared decks, PDF downloads for visitors and data privacy controls, all from Team.
A Framekit deck link has no password and no expiry; your tools are resetting the link, which kills the old one immediately, and unpublishing.
A team workspace. Teamspaces, workspace roles including a commenter role, external guests who edit with you, co-presenting and version history (30 days on Team, unlimited on Business).
Framekit has no team workspace for decks at all: a deck belongs to the account that created it, there is no deck invite, and its team members are website admins who cannot open it, so when two people write a deck, one builds it and the other comments on a PDF.
PowerPoint in both directions. Pitch imports PPTX, which is also its route in from Google Slides and Keynote, and exports PowerPoint without Pitch branding on paid plans. Framekit imports nothing and exports PowerPoint as pictures from Pro.
Pitch rooms. Shared rooms that bundle a deck with other resources behind one link and report how a client engages with the contents. There is no Framekit equivalent.
Already sure tracking matters but unsure Pitch is the right tracker? The best Pitch alternatives and the best sales deck software compare the other tools that report per-viewer data.
Where Framekit Wins
Framekit wins on two points, and both assume one person on your side builds creative documents rather than a team building sales collateral, which is the assumption that decides whether Pitch's telemetry and workspace are worth paying for in the first place.
Templates and elements that are the document. Director's treatments, lookbooks, photography portfolio books, production company credentials, proposals with a quote, rate cards, call sheets and shot lists, plus ready-made elements for shot cards, storyboard rows, moodboards, look cards, swatches and type specimens.
Pitch's 150-plus templates are excellent and aimed at pitches, reports and plans, not at a commercial bid.
Everything around the deck. A multi-page portfolio site on your own domain, client galleries with a password and a separate download PIN, video review with frame-accurate comments and approvals, and a store for digital files.
A director sends a treatment and then delivers cuts; Pitch handles the first half.
In one linePitch is team sales software priced per seat and the right buy when several people build decks, while Framekit is one creative's deck tool attached to the rest of the business, and it wins only while one person owns the decks.
How Each Tool Handles AI
Both Pitch and Framekit put a limit on AI, so the honest difference is how the allowance is granted and shared, and neither can be described as offering AI without a ceiling, whatever an older comparison may have said.
Pitch's Free plan includes 100 AI credits that do not renew once used. Plus and Team include 500 AI credits per seat per month and Business 750, and Pitch states that credits renew with the subscription and are shared across the whole team.
Its Pitch Agent can generate a presentation from a prompt.
Framekit has a monthly AI allowance on every plan, Free included, that grows with the plan, and deck AI draws on one pool across all your decks. Framekit does not publish the allowance as a count and this page does not quote one.
What is fixed: decks are unlimited on every plan, building from a template or editing a slide by hand never touches the allowance, and when the month's allowance is used, AI generation pauses until it resets while every manual tool keeps working.
In one lineAI is not the deciding cost in Framekit vs Pitch, because both meter it and Pitch even pools it; the deciding questions are how many people build decks and whether you need to know who read them.
Templates Built for Treatments and Credentials
The most visible difference for a creative studio is the starting point, because Framekit's library begins from the documents commercial clients and festivals ask for, while Pitch's begins from the documents a company sends investors, customers and its own board.
A production company credentials deck has a predictable run: who you are, the numbers, selected work, case studies, the team, clients, awards and press, rates.
Framekit's credentials template arrives with those sections laid out and the image slots sized for stills, so the work is replacing content rather than inventing structure.
A treatment works the same way, with a statement, visual approach, references, look and feel, music, storyboard, shoot days and delivery.
Paste a YouTube, Vimeo or Instagram link onto a slide and it becomes an embedded player, so reference clips play inside the treatment.
Pitch supports video too, with uploads from Plus and YouTube, Vimeo and Loom among its listed integrations, so the difference is the template's structure rather than whether video plays.
In one linePitch gives a team a polished business deck to adapt, and Framekit gives a studio the specific creative document its clients expect, which only matters if your decks are those documents.
Sending Without Tracking: What Studios Do Instead
Most creative studios that skip tracked links are not flying blind, because the signals that matter on a treatment or credentials deck come from people rather than dashboards, and Framekit gives you a few blunt tools that cover the common cases without a tracking subscription.
Send the link and the PDF together. A link updates in place when you fix a typo, and publishing again keeps the same address; a PDF survives forwarding, opens without a login and lives in the producer's inbox.
Framekit exports PDF on every plan, so there is no reason to choose.
Duplicate the deck per recipient when it matters. Decks are unlimited, and a duplicated deck starts as a draft with its own link and its own view count once published.
Sending three agencies three copies tells you whether each link was opened at all. It is a crude signal, not analytics: it will not tell you who inside the agency opened it, which slides they read or for how long.
Revoke instead of locking. Where Pitch would put a passcode on the link, Framekit's answer is the reset button: the old link stops working immediately and a new one is created.
That handles the forwarded-to-the-wrong-person problem after the fact rather than before it.
Ask. For a commercial bid, the producer will usually tell you whether the treatment went to the client and what they said, and that conversation carries more than a time-on-slide chart.
If your decks go to forty investors at once and nobody will tell you anything, this section does not apply, and Pitch Team is the right purchase.
What a Year Costs for One, Three and Five People
Per-seat pricing is the reason most people reach this comparison, so here is the same studio priced for a year at three sizes, using Pitch's yearly per-seat rates in euros and Framekit's yearly prices in dollars, with one Framekit account per person who builds decks and the feature that justifies each price beside it.
| Studio size | Pitch, year one | Framekit, year one | What the extra money buys on Pitch |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 person | EUR 0 on Free (100 AI credits once, branded PDFs), or EUR 120 on Plus | $0 on Free, $84 on Starter, or $180 on Pro for PowerPoint export | Custom fonts, video uploads and unbranded exports on Plus; no tracking until Team |
| 3 people, one builds every deck | EUR 120 on Plus for the builder; the others read sharing links | $84 on Starter, or $180 on Pro, whose team members can also edit the website | Custom fonts, video uploads and unbranded exports; tracking still needs Team |
| 3 people, all build decks | EUR 540 on Team, one workspace | $252 on three Starter accounts, or $540 on three Pro accounts, with no deck shared between them | A shared workspace, 25 tracked links, passcodes, custom domain, commenters, co-presenting, 30 days of version history |
| 5 people, all build decks | EUR 900 on Team, or EUR 1,200 on Business | $420 on five Starter accounts, with no shared workspace | Everything above, plus unlimited tracked links and version history on Business |
The one-person row is closer than it looks. Pitch Free is genuinely usable for unlimited presentations, with PDF exports carrying Pitch branding and 100 AI credits that do not come back.
Framekit Free makes unlimited decks with a Made with Framekit badge on the share link and an AI allowance that resets monthly. Neither tracks readers at that level.
From three people up, the question is who builds. If one person does, the others read links on either tool and only the builder pays: EUR 120 on Pitch Plus against $84 to $180 on Framekit.
If all three build, three Pitch Team seats are EUR 540 a year at the per-seat rates Pitch publishes and put them in one workspace with tracking, while three Framekit accounts cost $252 on Starter and share nothing, because a Framekit deck belongs to the account that made it and its team members are website admins.
An earlier version of this page priced Framekit Pro at $180 for three deck builders; that was wrong, and for a team of builders Pitch is the better buy, before its tracking, passcodes and custom domain even enter the comparison.
Run it on your own pipeline. List the decks you sent last quarter and mark the ones where knowing who opened them changed what you did next. If the answer is most of them, Pitch Team pays for itself in follow-ups.
If it is one or none, multiply EUR 180 a seat by the number of people who build decks and that is what the telemetry costs you each year.
Limits, Exports and Sharing Side by Side
Most deck decisions are settled by a limit you meet in week three rather than the feature list you saw on day one, so this table puts Pitch's and Framekit's published limits, exports and sharing controls next to each other with the plan each needs.
| Limit or control | Framekit | Pitch |
|---|---|---|
| Presentations | Unlimited, every plan | Unlimited, every plan |
| Members who can work on decks | 1, the account holder, on every plan; Pro's 3 and Business's unlimited team members are website admins | Up to 5 on Free, 1 on Plus, 25 on Team, 200 on Business |
| Slides in one deck | Up to 40 | Not compared here |
| External guests | Not applicable; anyone with the link can view | 2, 5, 25, unlimited |
| PDF export | Every plan | Every plan; branded on Free |
| PowerPoint export | Pro and up, slides as pictures, speaker notes kept, up to 60 slides | Paid plans, without Pitch branding |
| Import | None | PPTX, including from Google Slides and Keynote |
| Share link | Anyone with the link can view; not indexed by search engines | Basic sharing links on every plan |
| Viewer tracking | Total view count per deck | Advanced links: 25 on Team, unlimited on Business |
| Passcode on link | No | Team and Business |
| Custom domain | Your site, not deck links | Deck links on Team and Business |
| Version history | Not offered on decks | 30 days on Team, unlimited on Business |
| Offline and mobile | No offline app; PDF for offline | Offline access and mobile apps on every plan |
| Custom fonts | Uploaded fonts on paid plans | From Plus |
| Video on slides | YouTube, Vimeo and Instagram embeds | Uploads from Plus; YouTube, Vimeo and Loom integrations |
Two rows need a note. Pitch's plan card lists PowerPoint export from Plus while its comparison table lists it from Team, so check the plan you are buying. And "not offered" means exactly that for Framekit: there is no deck version history, so keep a PDF of each version you send.
What Happens When Things Go Sideways
The edge cases are where the difference between Pitch and Framekit stops being abstract, so here is what each tool does in six situations that come up on real jobs, using what each vendor documents rather than assumption.
A confidential treatment gets forwarded. On Pitch Team you would have set a passcode, and an advanced link shows you the extra visits. On Framekit, reset the link: the old one stops working immediately and a new one is created for the people who should have it.
The client wants to edit the deck in PowerPoint. Pitch exports an editable file on paid plans. Framekit's PowerPoint file is a picture of each slide; send the PDF or rebuild the slides they need in their master.
You run out of AI mid-project. Pitch Free's 100 credits do not renew. On Framekit, AI pauses until the monthly allowance resets and every manual tool keeps working, so no deck is ever locked.
Your team grows from three to six deck builders. On Pitch that is three more Team seats in the same workspace.
On Framekit it is three more separate accounts, because team members on Pro and Business administer the website and cannot open decks; if only one of the six builds decks, nothing changes on either tool.
You present somewhere without Wi-Fi. Pitch lists offline access on every plan. Framekit has no offline app, so download the PDF before you leave.
The deck runs to 70 slides. A Framekit deck holds up to 40 slides, so a 70-slide document has to be split into two decks before any export, each sent as its own link, PDF or picture-based PowerPoint file.
The Work Around the Deck
A creative studio's deck is usually the first step of a job rather than the whole of it, which is where Framekit and Pitch stop being the same category of product and where most of the real cost difference hides.
A director sends a treatment, wins the commercial, uploads cuts for review, collects frame-accurate notes, gets approval and delivers the final files.
A photographer sends a portfolio book, shoots, then delivers a gallery the client picks favourites from. Pitch covers the first step.
Framekit covers every step on one account: the portfolio site the deck links to, client galleries holding photos and video together, video review with version stacks and approval statuses, and a store for selling presets or LUTs with a 5 percent fee on Free and Starter, 3 percent on Pro and 0 percent on Business.
Storage is one pool, from 10GB on Free to 2TB on Business.
If the review step is the one you are pricing, Framekit vs Frame.io covers it in the same depth, and the best presentation tools for creative agencies ranks the deck side for studios.
Switching From Pitch to Framekit: A Checklist
Moving from Pitch to Framekit is a rebuild rather than an import, since Framekit imports no deck files, so this checklist keeps your tracked links alive until the decks that depend on them are finished, and only rebuilds what you send repeatedly.
| Step | What to do | Why |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Export the archive | Download each Pitch deck you keep as PDF, and PowerPoint where a client may ask | Your archive stops depending on a seat you are about to cancel |
| 2. Find tracked decks | List every live advanced link, passcode and pitch room | Framekit has none of these, so those decks stay on Pitch or go out as PDFs |
| 3. List repeat formats | Note the treatments, credentials, proposals and rate cards you rebuild each month | Only these are worth rebuilding as Framekit templates |
| 4. Rebuild from templates | Start each from the closest Framekit template and paste your copy | Template-built decks use little or none of the AI allowance |
| 5. Set the brand | Upload fonts and colours once on a paid plan | They apply across every slide in every deck |
| 6. Decide who builds | Name the one person who will own the decks, and give anyone else who builds decks their own account | Framekit team members are website admins who cannot open decks, so per-seat billing only disappears if one person builds |
| 7. Cancel seats last | Remove Pitch seats only after the last tracked link has done its job | Analytics from live links are what you lose |
What does not survive the move: tracking, passcodes, deck links on your domain, the shared deck workspace, live co-editing, comments, version history and editable PowerPoint. If any of those is load-bearing, keep those decks on Pitch.
How to Choose: A Decision Tree
Work through these questions in order and act on the first yes you reach, because the first four describe capabilities Framekit does not have rather than preferences, which is why the order matters more than any table above.
1. Do you need to know who opened a deck and how long they spent on each slide? Yes: Pitch Team or Business. No: go to question 2.
2. Does a deck link need a passcode or your own domain? Yes: Pitch Team. No: go to question 3.
3. Do two or more people on your side build or edit decks, at once or in turns, or leave comments on them? Yes: Pitch, because a Framekit deck belongs to one account and its team members cannot open it. No: go to question 4.
4. Must the client edit the file in PowerPoint? Yes: Pitch. No: go to question 5.
5. Is the document a treatment, credentials deck, lookbook, portfolio book or rate card? Yes: Framekit, for templates built for those. No: go to question 6.
6. Does one person build every deck, with everyone else only reading them? Yes: Framekit, at $84 a year on Starter for that one builder, with colleagues and clients reading the link or the PDF without an account. No: go to question 7.
7. Do you also need a portfolio site, client galleries or review links? Yes: Framekit, which carries all three on the account that holds the decks.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does Framekit tell me who opened my deck?
No. Framekit shows a total view count on each deck and nothing per recipient, so you cannot see which client opened it or how far they read.
Pitch Team includes 25 advanced links that track visits, slide views and time spent per slide, plus visit notifications, and if your follow-up depends on that information, Pitch is the correct tool.
Can I password-protect a Framekit deck?
No. A Framekit deck link has no password or expiry; anyone with the link can view it, and it never appears in search engines. You can reset the link, which stops the old one working immediately and issues a new one, or unpublish the deck.
Pitch offers passcode-protected links on its Team and Business plans.
Is Framekit cheaper than Pitch?
Framekit is cheaper than Pitch only when one person builds the decks. A single builder pays $84 a year on Framekit Starter against EUR 120 on Pitch Plus, and colleagues read the link on either tool without a seat.
For a team where several people build decks, Pitch is the better buy: three people on Pitch Team cost EUR 540 a year in one workspace with tracking, while three Framekit Starter accounts cost $252 and share nothing, because a Framekit deck belongs to the account that made it and its team members are website admins.
Does Pitch charge per seat?
Yes. Pitch's pricing page lists Plus at EUR 10, Team at EUR 15 and Business at EUR 20 per seat per month billed yearly, or EUR 12, 18 and 24 monthly, and says each plan's price depends on the number of seats.
Plus allows one member, Team up to 25 and Business up to 200; Free allows up to five.
Does Framekit have AI credits like Pitch?
Framekit has a monthly AI allowance on every plan, Free included, and deck AI draws on one pool across all your decks, so its AI is metered like Pitch's.
The difference is that Framekit lets you make unlimited decks and edit any slide by hand without spending anything. Pitch gives 100 credits once on Free and 500 or 750 per seat a month on paid plans, shared across the team.
Can two people edit a Framekit deck at once?
No, and two people cannot take turns on it from separate logins either.
Framekit has no live co-editing and no comments on decks, a deck belongs to the account that created it with no deck invite, and the team members on Pro (three) and Business (unlimited) are website admins who cannot open decks.
Pitch is built for teams editing together, with guests, workspace roles including commenters, co-presenting and version history.
Which is better for a director's treatment, Pitch or Framekit?
Framekit, unless the treatment needs a passcode, tracked opens or an editable PowerPoint.
Its treatment templates come with the statement, visual approach, references, look and feel, storyboard and shoot plan laid out, reference videos embed on the slide, and uploaded fonts apply across every slide on paid plans.
Pitch Team is the choice when a brand requires access controls on the link.
Does Framekit export editable PowerPoint like Pitch?
No. Framekit exports PowerPoint from the Pro plan with each slide as a full-bleed picture and speaker notes kept as real notes, up to 60 slides, so it presents anywhere but cannot be retyped.
Pitch exports PowerPoint without its branding on paid plans and imports PPTX files, which makes it the right tool when an agency must edit your slides.
Is Pitch's free plan usable?
Yes, for unlimited presentations with up to five members and two external guests, but PDF exports carry Pitch branding and its 100 AI credits do not renew once used. Tracking, passcodes and custom domains start on Team.
Framekit's free plan makes unlimited decks with a monthly AI allowance, PDF export and a Made with Framekit badge on the share link, and does not expire.
Can I move my Pitch decks to Framekit?
Not automatically. Framekit has no deck import, so moving means rebuilding each deck, ideally from the closest Framekit template with your copy pasted in.
Export every Pitch deck you keep as PDF first, and keep any deck that depends on tracked links or passcodes on Pitch until it has done its job.
What does Framekit include that Pitch does not?
A multi-page portfolio site on your own domain, client galleries with a password and a separate download PIN, video review with frame-accurate comments, version stacks and approvals, and a store for digital products.
None of those exist on Pitch, which is a deck platform. For a studio paying separately for decks, a website and a gallery tool, that consolidation is the reason to look at Framekit.
Can Pitch put shared decks on my own domain?
Yes. Pitch lists a custom domain for shared decks on its Team and Business plans, alongside passcode-protected links and email capture. Framekit puts your portfolio site on your own domain from Starter, but deck share links stay on Framekit's address and carry no password.
Can I present a deck offline?
Pitch lists offline access and mobile apps on every plan, including Free, so you can present without a connection. Framekit has no offline app; present from the browser while online, or download the PDF before you go, which works on every plan and opens anywhere without a login.
Should a creative agency use Pitch or Framekit?
It depends on whether the agency sells with decks or delivers with them. An agency whose new business runs on tracked proposals should use Pitch, because knowing who read the pricing slide is worth the per-seat cost.
An agency whose decks are credentials, treatments and case studies built by one person, and which also delivers work to clients, gets more from Framekit; an agency where several people build decks needs Pitch's shared workspace, because Framekit decks cannot be shared between accounts.
Final Verdict
Pitch is team presentation software with sales-grade telemetry, priced per seat accordingly.
Tracked links, passcodes, custom domains for decks, real-time collaboration, version history and PowerPoint in both directions are all real, all useful, and all absent from Framekit at every tier.
If your decks exist to generate a follow-up call, buy Pitch Team and do not think about it again.
Where Framekit loses. Framekit does not track who opened a deck, does not passcode-protect links, does not support live co-editing or comments, does not keep deck version history, and does not import or export editable PowerPoint.
It is not for teams where several people build or edit decks, because each deck belongs to one account and Framekit's team members are website admins who cannot open it, and it is not for sales teams whose follow-up depends on open data or for agencies that hand over editable files.
Where it wins. Solo creatives, and studios where one person owns every deck, whose decks are treatments, credentials, lookbooks and proposals and who want the portfolio, the client galleries, the review links and the store on the same account, with colleagues helping on the website rather than in the decks.
Related readingthe best Pitch alternatives, Framekit vs Gamma, Pitch vs Canva, the agency credentials deck template and Framekit's pricing.
